SECTION III
REVIEW OF NINTH PLAN POWER PROGRAMME
The Ninth
Plan Power Programme was finalised on the basis of a report of the Steering
Committee on Energy and Power and the reports of the various Experts Groups.
The main objective was achieving self-sufficiency in power supply,
improving quality of supply,
reliability and bringing about economies and efficiencies in all
operations. The strategy for Ninth Plan
was the completion of ongoing projects on priority on a time bound action plan
both for generation and T&D. It was
suggested to formulate an action plan to accelerate clearances and construction
of hydro projects involving time consuming clearances and long gestation
periods. It was emphasised to give thrust
to the development of renewable sources which include –
Small hydro
Wind
Solar
Sea waves
Biomass and
Co-generation
The strategy for Ninth Plan also envisaged induction of
independent power producers in public, private and joint sectors for short
gestation projects and for mobilising additional resources. This was in spite of the disadvantage that
any new entrant with associated risks may lead to higher cost.
The following activities were also
identified as thrust areas:
-
Improvement of system operating conditions by reducing
T&D losses
-
Strengthening of the distribution system through system
improvement programmes
-
Renovation, modernisation and uprating of existing hydel
plants on a time bound basis
-
Bringing about reforms in areas covering organisation,
resource mobilisation, tariffs and consumer relations.
-
Take up measures for energy conservation and demand side
management
-
Improvement in commercial deals for supply from Central
Pool for the benefit of the State.
3.1 GENERATION
The strategy for the Ninth Plan was speedy implementation
of the on-going projects on priority basis by ensuring interruption free work
by the Board – contractors – Labour Unions.
The revised Ninth Plan generation
programme for the KSEB envisaged a generation capacity addition totaling to
613.6 MW as per details below.
MW
1.
Lower Periyar (H) 180
2.
Kakkad (H) 50
3.
Kuttiadi Extension (H) 50
4.
Other Hydel Projects 99
5.
Brahmapuram Diesel Power Plant 106.6
6.
Kozhikkode Diesel Power Plant
128
![]()
613.6
![]()
In addition, the Ninth Plan power
programme of KSEB also envisaged the following reservoir augmentation schemes.
MU
1.
Azhutha Diversion
57
2.
Vazhikkadavu Diversion
24
3.
Kuttiar Diversion
37
4.
Vadakkepuzha Diversion
12
5.
Kuttiayadi Augumentation 223
Total
revised financial allocation for the generation programme during Ninth Plan
including advance action on new generation projects amounted to Rs.535.53 crores.
The overall position regarding physical
achievement during the Ninth Plan period is as given in Table 3.1.
Table.3.1
Status of completed projects
|
Completed Projects |
MW |
Year of Commissioning |
|
1. Lower Periyar (H) |
180 |
1997 |
|
2. Kakkad (H) |
50 |
1999 |
|
3. Kuttiadi Extension (H) |
50 |
2001 |
|
1. Other
Hydel Projects Peppara Maduppetty Kuthungal Poringalkuthu L.B.Extension Malampuzha |
3 2 12 16 2.5 |
1996 1998 2001 1999 2001 |
|
2. Brahmapuram
Diesel Power Plant |
106.6 |
1998 |
|
3. Kozhikkode
Diesel Plant |
128 |
1999 |
|
|
549.1 |
|
The progress on other generation schemes
programmed during Ninth Plan viz. Malankara (10.5 MW) and Kuttiyadi Tail Race
(3.75 MW) is held up. Work on small
hydel schemes of capacity totaling to 12.6 MW proposed to be implemented with
technical and financial assistance of HIC/INSHP China is progressing at a slow
pace. While most of the work on the diversion schemes viz; Azhutha and
Vazhikkadavu have been completed, there has not been much progress on the other
two schemes viz; Kuttiar and Vadakkepuzha.
The work on Kuttiyadi Augmentation although almost complete, further work is held up due to dispute with
the contractor. Not much headway has also
been made in respect of long gestation projects and new small hydel projects
for which provisions for advance action has been made in the financial
allocations.
The position regarding financial progress furnished
by the KSEB indicates that although the allocation for generation projects was
only an amount of Rs.535.53 crores, the expenditure up to August 2001 was
Rs.910.25 crores. This has been made possible only by diversion of allocations
for System Improvement Works and Renovation & Modernisation and schemes with REC assistance.
In
addition to KSEB’s own power projects, a few thermal projects by other agencies
have been implemented. Prominent among
them is NTPC’s Thermal Power Station (350 MW) at Kayamkulam, the entire
generation from which is allocated to
Kerala. Another major project is that
of BSES (private) with an installed capacity of 157 MW which
were already been commissioned.
RPG’s Thermal Project (Pvt.) of 20 MW at Kasargode has also been
commissioned.
As regards the hydel projects like
Bhoothathankettu (16 MW), Ullunkal (7 MW) and Karikkayam (15 MW) which have
been earmarked for execution by private parties, not much progress has been
made so far. Meenvallom small hydro
project of 3 MW capacity is under implementation by District Panchayat,
Palakkad.
The review of the Ninth Plan generation
programme by KSEB reveals that there has been time overrun and consequent cost
overrun in all the hydro projects completed by the Board during the Ninth Plan
period. Completion of most of the hydel
projects as envisaged during the Ninth Plan indicates some improvement in
project management by KSEB. However
this has to be sustained and further improved by KSEB so as to achieve better results during the Tenth
Plan period.
It was estimated that 10% of the capacity
of existing hydro stations could be increased through renovation and
modernisation activities. While some
progress has been made in respect of Pallivasal, Sengulam and Panniar hydro
generating stations, no break through has been achieved in taking up R&M
works in respect of other hydro power stations. Out of a total allocation of Rs.398 crores for R&M, actual expenditure up to 31-3-2002 was only Rs.135.44 crores. As stated earlier, the funds earmarked for
this purpose have been diverted for completing normal generation works.
§
Completion of on-going schemes
§
220 kV, 110kV and 66 kV line loading to be reduced.
§
No more 66 KV lines.
Upgrade to 110 kV wherever possible.
66 kV to be completely phased out in next 10 to 15 years.
§
11 kV to LT ratio to be gradually reduced
§
Resort to Three
Phase distribution wherever possible
§
Optimum use of capacitors
§
Optimisation of Transformer Capacities – large-scale
conversion of distribution transformers into smaller size - existing large
transformers to be relocated at concentrated load centres
§
While POWERGRID would be implementing EHV transmission system, KSEB to concentrate on
low voltage transmission network and distribution system
§
Energy audit to be conducted and both technical and
commercial losses to be reduced on a phased programme.
§
Conduct power system studies and evolve the most
cost-effective plan for additional transmission works to be undertaken in the
second half of Ninth Plan.
The review of the Ninth Plan T & D programme does not
indicate realisation of many of the above objectives. While most of the
financial allocations has been
utilised, the State is yet to get the benefits from the investment.
3.3.1 TRANSMISSION
On the
transmission side, out of 4572 ckt km of transmission lines targeted for completion
during the IX Plan period, only 1360 KM (30%) has been completed upto the end
of the plan period. Similarly, out of
the 172 Nos. of substations targeted
for completion, only 56 Nos (32.5 %)
have been completed. Details are
furnished in Table 3.3.1 below. The
progress on the remaining works by and large remains tardy.
PHYSICAL
ACHIEVEMENTS OF TRANSMISSION WORKS
DURING
9TH
FIVE YEAR PLAN
|
Particulars |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2000-02 |
Total |
||||||
|
|
Target |
Achievement |
Target |
Achievement |
Target |
Achievement |
Target |
Achievement |
Target |
Achievement |
Target |
Achievement |
|
220 kV Sbstations(Nos) |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Nil |
Nil |
3 |
Nil |
12 |
5 |
|
110 kV Substations(Nos) |
30 |
8 |
20 |
9 |
19 |
7 |
36 |
19 |
31 |
3 |
136 |
46 |
|
66 kV Substations(Nos) |
7 |
2 |
Nil |
1 |
2 |
Nil |
3 |
Nil |
12 |
2 |
24 |
5 |
|
220 kVDC line (circuit Km) |
548 |
283 |
562 |
178 |
388 |
158.5 |
Nil |
Nil |
88.6 |
Nil |
1586.6 |
619.5 |
|
110 kVDC lines (Circuit Km) |
565 |
207 |
704 |
150 |
565 |
112.93 |
487 |
173.82 |
369.4 |
58.33 |
2690.4 |
702.08 |
|
66 kVDC (circuit Km) |
63 |
25 |
Nil |
1.2 |
98 |
Nil |
59.23 |
Nil |
74.44 |
12 |
294.67 |
38.2 |
Out of the total budgeted allocation of Rs. 875.5 crores
for Transmission, an expenditure of Rs. 708.42 crores has already been
incurred. It has been pointed out that
loans availed at high interest rates (15.5%) for specific works (for eg. 33 kV
substations) have been diverted to non-plan purposes resulting in huge financial
losses. The fact that the overall
expenditure is about 80% of the budgeted amount, clearly shows lack of
prioritisation of works resulting in ineffective utilisation of funds. Another major reason for poor performance in
the execution of transmission works is the lack of effective monitoring mechanism.
While KSEB had created additional units especially for monitoring the
implementation of transmission projects they have not been functioning
effectively due to inappropriate deployment and these units have been merely
doing progress reporting. A cursery
look at the functioning of the monitoring mechanism in the KSEB suggests that
it was not effective in foreseeing bottlenecks and tackling them. There was also no mechanism to cut short
delays caused due to slippage's so as to adhere to the original completion
schedules.
3.3.2 DISTRIBUTION
On the distribution side, the position regarding target
and achievement in respect of various category of distribution works is given
in Table 3.3.2 below:
Physical
Achievements of Distribution Works During IX Plan
|
Particulars |
Target |
Achievement
up to 9/2001 |
|
11 kV Lines (km) |
11500 |
4137.5 |
|
LT lines (km) |
33550 |
26894 |
|
Distribution Transformers (Nos) |
11050 |
6151 |
|
Service Connections (Nos) |
15,68,015 |
1,76,498 |
|
Agricultural Connections (Nos) |
56,000 |
79,317 |
The
above position clearly shows that the implementation of the distribution
programme during the IX plan went against
the strategy adopted for implementation of the distribution programme. It may be seen that even the programme for HT and LT works did
not conform to the strategy for bringing down the HT – LT ratio to 1:2. Actual achievement in respect of new HT and LT works during IX plan period
corresponded to a HT-LT ratio of 1:4
which hardly helped to progressively bring down the ratio to the level of 1:2.
New service connections both for agricultural and non-agricultural
sectors exceeded the targets. This
coupled with the delay in implementation of HT distribution system at 11 kV and
other system improvement works could adversely affect the reliability of supply
and increase the system losses.
It is seen that out of budget allocation of Rs. 1086.53
crores for distribution, an expenditure of Rs. 871.36 crores has been incurred up to 9/2001. This indicates diversion of funds to other sectors as the allocation could have been fully utilised
due to the short gestation nature of the distribution works. The worst affected categories are 11 kV
lines and distribution transformers ultimately affecting quality and
reliability of supply.
3.4 Non conventional and renewable sources of
Energy
ANERT is the nodal agency involved in the propagation
and implementation of programmes on non-conventional and renewable sources of
energy in the State. These programmes
are intended for gathering and disseminating useful knowledge in various fields
of non-conventional energy, energy conservation and rural technology, conduct
studies, demonstrate, implement and support implementation of schemes and
projects in the fields. The programmes
are implemented under two heads – ANERT programmes and IRE programmes.
Ninth plan earmarked Rs.70 crores for ANERT
and Rs.49.50 crores for IREP. Year-
wise provision, expenditure in respect of the sector during IX plan
period is given in Table 3.4 below.
Table
3.4
Year Wise Outlay and Expenditure During IX Plan(Rs.lakhs)
|
Sector |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
IX Plan |
|||||
|
ANERT |
2370 |
||||||||||