Annexure - I

TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN - DRAFT GUIDELINES

1. Introduction

      Kerala State was a forerunner in the development of physical and social infrastructure and human development, but was lagging behind in economic growth and employment. Over the years, the State has become a high cost, low investment, low employment and low productivity economy. In recent years, the government's financial position has become critical and there is decline even in matters in which the State was a leader. Assets created at high cost have badly deteriorated for want of maintenance.

       The main objective of the Tenth Plan is to reverse this trend and take bold and positive steps to increase investment, efficiency of resource use and employment and adopt special measures for the weaker sections with a view to making the State attain a leading position in infrastructure, economic growth, social justice and human development, by the year 2010.

      The Tenth Plan will not be merely a list of schemes and programmes implemented by State and Central Government agencies. It will mark a comprehensive approach to development in which all sections - local governments, private sector, co-operatives, peoples' organisations, self-help groups, self-employed, farmers and others - will play an important and significant role and will be invited to participated appropriately in all sectors. A climate favourable for investment in agriculture, industry, infrastructure and service will be created. The government will create the conditions for such participation and involvement through changes in laws and policies and appropriate facilitatory and regulatory mechanisms. It will be a People's Plan in all respects.

      Regarding government agencies, the general perception is that they have a lot of flab and feather-beding and that there is considerable waste of resources. There is a feeling that the objectives of each organisation have been made subordinate to the increasing demands of those manning them. Therefore, each activity has to be critically examined from the point of view of its relevance to objectives and fundamental changes brought about in the best interests of the users and the public.

      The Tenth Plan will thus be as much a Reform Plan as a Resource or Programme Plan. This implies that going beyond making allocation decisions for resources in terms of projects and programmes, importance has to be given to the process and systems of development. There is need to move away from conventional methods of plan preparation which have over a period of time routinised. The Reform Plan requires a relook at institutions and structures which are related to development in terms of laws, procedures, systems and administrative and managerial processes. In fact, Reforms will have precedence because economy of resource use and efficiency of programme implementation depend a great deal on them. And Fiscal Reforms will be an important part of the broader reforms.


Part-A

General Approach


       In order to free resources for development there is an urgent need to contain the revenue deficit for which wasteful non-plan expenditure has to be curtailed. The State should aim at reducing its revenue deficit from the present 3.5% of GDP to zero at the end of the Tenth Five Year Plan. In order to augment resources for investment it is necessary to tap non-plan revenues to the maximum without hurting the legitimate interests of the poor and the needy. Those who can afford to pay must pay in the interest of those who cannot pay.

      In view of the scarcity of resources, return on investment and quick completion of projects must be inviolable pre-conditions for fixing priorities in investment. Borrowing should be resorted to only to finance the Plan and that too that part of the plan which ensures proper returns in future or that which goes to the most vulnerable sections of society.

      Considering the limited resources available and the need to optimize resource use every existing Plan scheme has to be suitably appraised before its continuance is suggested. It is time to give up the 'trend' approach and go in for an approach which calls for unequivocal justification if some spending is to be continued. Through this method all sub-optimal schemes and those without any utility or impact have to be scrapped.

      It follows that the same old inter-sectoral allocation cannot continue in the Tenth Plan. The needs and priorities of State spending have to be redrawn to harmonize them with the new context, objectives and role of Government.

      Departmentalism has been the bane of Kerala resulting in a compartmentalised and distorted view of development often leading to duplication of efforts, proliferation of institutions and agencies and, more important, losing possible synergies, which are critical to development. The Tenth Plan should aim at greater convergence and more joined up efforts. There is a big need to bring together departments, agencies and institutions for working in partnership. Even if they cannot be merged they can be networked. Integrated projects with clear backward and forward linkages would take precedence over isolated sectoral programmes. Also long pending projects, which are in an advanced state have to be given priority for completion within a year or two. But wherever possible, if a project can be closed at the current stage without resulting in any infructuous expenditure, that would be the better alternative, if the cost in terms of resources and time to complete it as per the original schedule is not justified economically or socially.


      With the advent of local governments multilevel planning has become a necessity. A conscious attempt has to be made to identify the responsibilities of each tier and to achieve organic linkages between tiers. The higher tiers need perform only the higher order functions and this applies to the State Government as well.

      The core objective of the Plan will be reduction in unemployment and elimination of poverty. For reduction in unemployment a labour intensive growth strategy suited to the needs of the educated labour force of Kerala has to be followed. Diversifying agriculture into high value crops and value addition, tapping the potential of information technology and biotechnology, further strengthening tourism development appropriate to the potential of the State and promoting the new generation small-scale industries and positioning the traditional industries in the proper place could form the basic elements of this strategy.

Part-B

1.    Multi-sectoral Issues

      (a) Poverty Reduction

      As regards poverty the first priority would be on the outliers like the tribals who have been denied the benefits of development and even pushed to the margins through the twin process of exploitation and dependence inducing welfarism. The concept of poverty is to be redefined and has to be construed in terms of the level of access to an agreed set of entitlements, which can be progressively enlarged.

      Elimination of poverty requires both macro as well as micro strategies. At the micro level a convergence of programmes, resources and services is called for. This can be achieved only through a demand-led process, which means the poor have to be organized and empowered to participate in the development process through a strategy of self-help. There is need to evolve an anti-poverty sub-plan which could include setting up of micro enterprises for self-employment, enabling people to achieve wage employment through a massive capacity building exercise to enhance the skills and capabilities of the poor, providing wage employment while creating rural infrastructure, targeting basic services to the most needy and providing direct social security to the most vulnerable. In this anti poverty sub-plan the poorest groups like tribals, traditional fishermen and marginalized artisans have to be given special importance. As far as the tribals are concerned the focus should be on empowerment.

      To avoid conflict and unfair competition for anti-poverty funds and schemes, it is necessary to evolve a transparent poverty index primarily related to access to a prescribed set entitlements. Using the index different groups of the poor can be graded and this process supplemented with a participatory poverty assessment, which is already under way in the State. Based on this differential strategies can be worked out according to the characteristics of poverty which affect different groups.

      A five-fold approach to poverty reduction would be necessary. Firstly self-employment opportunities of a permanent nature could be available to the poor both by macro economic strategies aimed at labour intensive growth and micro strategies intended to develop the capabilities of the poor so that they can match the requirements of the formal and semi-formal sectors. Secondly, self-employment through micro enterprises can be promoted through a package consisting of credit, subsidy, skill development, product development and marketing. The mission approach adopted by Kudumbashree may be improved further with better linkages with sister departments and local governments. Thirdly with government and local government support the minimum basic needs infrastructure related to housing, sanitation, water supply, electricity and connectivity have to be provided.

      A different rate of subsidy has to be followed for provision of basic needs infrastructure to individual families, with full subsidy for the lowest decile of the population, 50% subsidy for the next decile and 25% for the third decile. Fourthly the access of the poor to health and educational facilities needs to be mnade easier and an improvement in the quality of these services has to be aimed at. Finally for the most vulnerable groups, a social security system and food security system has to be arranged with higher level of support than at present but with better targeting.

      Within the overall poverty strategy there have to be separate component plans for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and the disabled. In the case of these groups the aim must be to prepare family specific plans for improving quality of life and removing barriers to development. In the case of the Scheduled Castes and the disabled. The prime focus could be on human resource development with the purpose of equipping them to tap the job market. In the case of Scheduled Tribes protecting and upgrading the land resources, value addition to the non-timber forest produce and high quality education support. In remote tribal areas the use of animators from among the tribals to function as bare-foot development and service agents may have to be resorted to. Non-conventional institutional options have to be tried out in the case of education, health, economic development and so on where NGOs with good track record could play a positive role. To make good the loss of land, Joint Forest Management with higher returns to the participating families could be adopted. Preservation of tribal culture and fostering of their traditional knowledge have to be essential ingredients in the empowerment of tribals.

      In conceptualising the plan for reduction of poverty and its implementation the active participation of the stakeholders is absolutely essential and the government has to play a proactive role. In order to identify the opportunities for the poor in the formal and informal economies and to equip them to use the opportunities it may be necessary to use the best expertise available in the country both from the public and private sectors. A close monitoring and a system of concurrent evaluation through third-party agencies would be required, in addition to social audit.

b) Environment

      A broad cross-sectoral approach is suggested to tackle environmental issues. Protection of good quality forests, upgradation of degraded forests and de-emphasizing extractory forestry but encouraging sustainable revenue yielding management and promoting dispersed social forestry through local governments would constitute the elements of forestry development. An integrated view of land, water and biomass translating itself into watershed management with building blocks at the local government level built up to river basin level management plans would be required. For this become a reality there is need for change of attitudes and infusion to technical skills of a multi-disciplinary nature. Departmental boundaries would have to merge and concerted multi-level action required from the irrigation, water supply, agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries departments with the active support of institutions like Agricultural University, CWRDM and CESS.

      In the case of water resources for bio-mass development large irrigation schemes are no longer relevant. Appropriate micro level water harvesting, water conservation and water management has to be adopted. To start with, probably the old minor irrigation structures have to be rehabilitated through farmer groups and handed over to them. Even in the larger schemes farmer management at the distribution level has to be tried out.

      In the case of drinking water supply community based approaches are required especially in the rural areas both for running the old schemes and for managing the new schemes. Only where small schemes are unviable should larger schemes be attempted. Even in large schemes, unbundling of distribution systems may become necessary.

      For upgradation of the quality of environment solid and liquid waste management, again on a decentralized scale with focus on management, right from the source is required. A total plan for solid and liquid waste management is required where the components at the cutting edge level are prepared and implemented by urban local governments and village Panchayats or groups of village Panchayats. Air pollution is another area, which requires increasing attention.

c) Capacity Building & Work Culture:

      In all sectors of activity the promotion of a new work culture has to be stressed for speedy, transparent and honest service to the people. Multiple skills have to be encouraged. Training and retraining will not be viewed as peripheral activities but as essential parts of carrer of each employed person so that he will be able to adjust to changing needs.

      A networking of institutions set up by the State government is necessary. In some cases mergers would be advisable. Tie-ups with centres of excellence both in and outside the State would help enhance the quality of training.

d) Use of Information Technology

      Kerala has great potential for IT Industry but now accounts only for 2% of the country's turnover. Much remains to be done promotion of IT industry through appropriate policies and provision of infrastructure. IT is to be used for governance to improve public services. A well worked out programme of computerisation of departments is necessary. Computer education has to be urgently started from the upper primary stage. All this can be done with least cost to Government through appropriate policies and programmes. It will be advantageous to undertake the use of IT as a coordinated Mission.

e) Gender Sensitivity

      It is necessary to be sensitive to the gender dimensions of development and incorporate them in the Plan through a kind of gender budgeting, which promotes gender sensitive schemes in various sectors in a cross-cutting manner.

f) Social Security

      The social assistance (Government schemes for pensions and allowances) and social insurance (Welfare funds) schemes have to be re oriented to make them more effective. Labour market conditioned and gender differences have to be taken into account. Innovative mechanisms have to be formed for enlarging social security including some form of health security, at least to cover those below the poverty line and other low income families.

2. Sectoral Issues

(a) Agriculture and Allied Sectors

      In these sectors there is a natural limit to expansion but intensification and quality improvement and optimisation of relative strengths need to be the areas of concentration. The departments of agriculture, animal husbandry and dairy development have to give greater emphasis to extension, transfer of technology, and dairy development have to give greater emphasis to extension, transfer of technology, arrangement of inputs and facilitation of farmer led activities. In order to achieve economies of scale, grouping of farmers on the lines of self-help groups or leasing of adjacent lands to enterprising farmers or groups could prove useful.

      These sectors would have to be seen as part of the watershed oriented approach. Bulk of the investment in common infrastructure and in preparation of locality specific action plans should be from local governments co-financing area specific projects and taking up pilots. Rather than spreading resources thin, efforts must be made to concentrate on selected geographical areas with maximum potential for returns.

      In the case of agriculture, high value crops including horticulture and organic farming deserve special attention. Development of internal markets through farmer controlled storage systems and outlets could be of special priority.

      In the case of fisheries development of inland fisheries needs to be explored. The livelihood issues of traditional fishermen needs to be taken up on a holistic basis skin to the strategy suggested for poverty reduction.

      The co-operatives have to route more credit to the primary sector. Co-operatives must be encouraged to be self-supporting and autonomous, assisted by professional management. Legislative changes enabling formation/change of co-operatives on these lines are necessary.

(b) Health

      In the case of health difficult decisions have to be taken on resource allocation - between primary health care and secondary ands tertiary health care; between first generation and second generation health problems; between needs of the younger population and the aging population. It is necessary to identify a basket of medical services that are cost effective and benefit the most. The levels at which these services are provided also have to be identified. Beyond the assured level of services, payment in a graded manner may have to be thought of except in the case of the poor for whom special arrangements are required.

      While encouraging the growth of the private sector in providing health services a transparent system of regulation and grading has to be introduced probably through independent professional institutions. The link between various streams of medicine has to be established preferably at the level of the PHC.

      Some of the reforms in the sector relate to greater autonomy to the tertiary institutions, development of diagnostic, treatment and referral protocols and introduction of generic drugs to bring down the cost of medicine.

c) Education

      In this sector the accent should be on reduction of government expenditure and improving quality at even level. In higher education the available infrastructure has to be optimally used through courses in emerging areas. The 'Sarva Sikha Abhayan' of Government of India is to be properly integrated with local governments plans on education.

      Institutions like Polytechnics and ITIs have to move on to modern courses. This calls for retraining of the teachers.

d) Infrastructure

      Top priority should be given to rehabilitation and upgradation of existing infrastructure on a planned basis with the State Government and Local Governments adhering to a commonly agreed priority in the infrastructure sector. As far as private sector participation on BOT basis has to be encouraged.

      Cost reduction techniques and technologies need be integrated into the government standards related to infrastructure creation. Reforms like transparency providing of technical designs by the contractors, performance contracts and third party quality assurance systems could be thought of.

      The development of ports, Labours and inland water-ways has to be given special thrust fully utilizing the possibilities of private sector participation.

e) Power

      In the case of power a proper energy mix with due share to hydro power has to be identified with special priority for tapping small hydel power potential. Stand alone projects servicing remote areas could be taken up by local governments with the operation and maintenance being entrusted to the local community.

      Power sector reforms should focus on improving efficiency of the Electricity Board in all the three functions of generation, transmission and distribution. Non-conventional energy should continue to be encouraged both to service remote areas and to supplement conventional power in areas where there is scope.

f) Industries

      An aggressive promotion of private investment is necessary by making the State investor-friendly. For this to happen, procedural delays have to be avoided and attitudinal changes have to be brought about in the labour force. Unfair practices should be strictly discouraged both on the part of management and labour. Changes in laws may be necessary for this and to eliminate unlawful activities like 'Attimari'.

      Kerala enjoys comparative advantage in sectors related to information technology, biotechnology and tourism. The gains of the past have to be consolidated and new methods of facilitation especially in development of infrastructure and creation of qualified manpower, adopted.

      The cluster based approach to small scale industries needs to be concretized. The traditional industries like coir, handloom and other village industries need to be re-positioned according to the national and international demand for the products. Upgradation of technology and techniques is critical in the sector.

      Top priority should be given to Public sector reforms which should be based on viable revival packages as well as mergers and closures, diversification, expansion sand conversion to joint ventures as may be appropriate. As a general rule, the Consolidated Fund should not be used to bolster loss-making PSUs. Professional management should be introduced in all PSUs during the Tenth Plan.

g) Tourism

      High priority should be given this sector. The approach should be to select three or four sites with proven demand and potential and plan to develop each of them in an integrated manner as regards infrastructure and services. Maximum private participation should be encouraged through innovative measures.

3. Local Governments

      Local governments are expected to plan and implement programmes covering a third of the State's Plan size. Based on the lessons of the past, the gains have to be consolidated and the failures made good. Some of the important areas which demand attention are -

-  Developing a long range Plan with focus on productive infrastructure rather than    distribution of beneficiary oriented assistance.

- Enhancing the quality of planning through proper techniques and scientific ordering of    priority especially infrastructure creation.

- Focus on renewal and upgradation of assets so that they are out to optimum use.

- Integration of plans across tiers of local governments and between local governments    and State Governments.

- Mobilising people's participation and contributions in kind, cash, including special    involvement by NRKs in specific programmes and improvement institutions.

- Improving efficiency in spending and ensuring greater accountability

- Improving the running of institutions and delivery of services, which have been brought    under the local Governments.

- Reassessing the devolution norms and sectoral priorities.